Bare Ultrawarmth Glove (5mm) Review
Last updated: July 2025
- Warm in low 50°F water: Suitable for quarries without going dry
- Dexterous fit: Allows bolt snaps and camera use
- Durable build: Stitching and cuffs hold up after a year
- Versatile comfort: Works with wetsuits and drysuits
- Higher price tag: Costs more than basic gloves
See current pricing at: Dive Right In Scuba
A standout wet glove for serious divers who want warmth and dexterity without bulk. These Bare Ultrawarmth gloves fit like a second skin, stay warm in cold water, and hold up to repeated use without fraying or flushing. I’ve used them extensively in both wetsuit and drysuit dives down to the low 50s and was impressed enough to buy a backup pair. They outperform cheaper gloves by a wide margin.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent fit and dexterity | Slightly more expensive than basic gloves |
| Warm in low 50s without going dry | |
| Durable stitching and cuff integrity | |
| Comfortable with both wetsuit and drysuit | |
Why I Chose Bare Ultrawarmth Glove (5mm)
I started with the 3mm version of this glove and was surprised how well it fit compared to other brands. When I needed something for colder water, I immediately sought out the 5mm version. My previous gloves were from Aqualung and were a bad fit for my hands — bulky, loose, and already falling apart after just 10 dives. The Bare gloves felt tailor-made by comparison.
Verdict
These gloves are so good I bought a second backup pair in case Bare stops making them. That probably says everything.
Would I buy them again? Yes. Already did.
Who Bare Ultrawarmth Glove (5mm) Is Best For
This item is best suited for:
- Divers needing warmth in low 50s°F water without dry gloves
- Those who require dexterity for bolt snaps or camera controls
- Divers who switch between wetsuits and drysuits
It may not be ideal for:
- Budget-minded buyers seeking low-cost gloves
- Divers in extreme cold needing full dry gloves
Deep Dive into the Score
Scoring System: Each category is scored out of 10 and weighted by importance. This model is used consistently across all gear reviews for transparency.
| Category | Score | Raw Score | Weight | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Function & Performance | Exceptional | 9.5 | 30% | 2.85 |
| Ease of Use | Exceptional | 9.5 | 20% | 1.90 |
| Versatility | Strong | 8.5 | 15% | 1.28 |
| Durability & Build Quality | Exceptional | 9.0 | 15% | 1.35 |
| Value | Strong | 8.5 | 10% | 0.85 |
| Brand Trust & Transparency | Exceptional | 9.0 | 10% | 0.90 |
| Total | 9.13 / 10 | |||
Rounded Display Score: 9.1 / 10 — Exceptional
Deep Dive Score Explanations
- Function & Performance – 9.5: Keeps my hands warm in low 50s without bulk or flushing issues.
- Ease of Use – 9.5: Easy to don and doff, even with cold fingers. Slides under or over wrist seals well.
- Versatility – 8.5: Great for both wet and drysuit use, but not for extreme cold.
- Durability & Build – 9.0: Quality construction. No breakdown after a year of dives.
- Value – 8.5: More expensive than some gloves, but worth every penny given performance.
- Brand Trust – 9.0: Bare consistently puts out solid thermal gear. No concerns about quality.
Performance in the Water
- Thermal Comfort: Warm enough for low 50s Fahrenheit water without switching to dry gloves. For many dives, that’s all I needed.
- Dexterity: The gloves strike a great balance — thick enough for warmth, but still flexible enough for bolt snaps, camera buttons, and mask adjustments.
- Fit: Perfect for my hand shape. No bunching or extra material in the fingers.
- Durability: Still going strong after a year of use. No seam leaks, no unraveling stitching.
- Use Case: I prefer wet gloves with my drysuit unless the temps call for full dry. These gloves make that possible.