Last updated: July 2025
Bare Ultrawarmth Glove (3mm) Review

- Fit and dexterity: Snug, precise feel without bulk
- Durable construction: Holds up after regular use
- Thermal performance: Comfortable into the high 50s°F
- Comfort: Tight but not restrictive
- Worth the price: Reliable for frequent diving
A nearly perfect warm-water glove that punches far above its weight in both dexterity and comfort. I’ve used the 3mm Ultrawarmth gloves in pools, quarries, and even open water dives into the high 50s and they’ve delivered excellent warmth and performance without any bulk. Their fit is spot-on, and they’re the reason I later bought the 5mm version for colder dives.
Pros & Cons
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Excellent fit and dexterity | Not warm enough for very cold water |
Durable construction | Slightly pricier than other 3mm gloves |
Works well for many temperate dives, not just warm water | |
Performs above expectations for a 3mm glove | |
Why I Chose Bare Ultrawarmth Glove (3mm)
These were the first Bare gloves I purchased. I was looking for something with better dexterity and fit than the bulky 5mm Aqualung gloves I already owned. The 3mm Ultrawarmth fit my hand size and shape perfectly and performed beautifully in pool sessions and open water. After using them, I was impressed enough to buy the 5mm version for colder dives.
Verdict
This glove delivered exactly what I was looking for: warmth, fit, and performance without bulk. It completely changed my expectations for what a glove could feel like underwater.
Would I buy it again? Absolutely. In fact, it’s the reason I trusted Bare enough to buy the 5mm model later.
Who Bare Ultrawarmth Glove (3mm) Is Best For
This item is best suited for:
- Divers needing high dexterity in warm to temperate water
- Those who want a snug glove without excess material
- Frequent travelers or local divers who value low bulk
It may not be ideal for:
- Divers in very cold conditions
- Budget shoppers looking for the lowest price
Deep Dive into the Score
Scoring System: Each category is scored out of 10 and weighted by importance. This model is used consistently across all gear reviews for transparency.
Category | Score | Raw Score | Weight | Weighted |
---|---|---|---|---|
Function & Performance | Exceptional | 10.0 | 30% | 3.00 |
Ease of Use | Exceptional | 10.0 | 20% | 2.00 |
Versatility | Exceptional | 10.0 | 15% | 1.50 |
Durability & Build Quality | Exceptional | 9.0 | 15% | 1.35 |
Value | Strong | 8.5 | 10% | 0.85 |
Brand Trust & Transparency | Exceptional | 9.0 | 10% | 0.90 |
Total | 9.60 / 10 |
Rounded Display Score: 9.6 / 10 — Exceptional
Deep Dive Score Explanations
- Function & Performance – 10.0: Performs above expectations in every respect. I use these down to the high 50s with zero complaints.
- Ease of Use – 10.0: One of the easiest gloves I’ve ever used. Quick donning, great flexibility, and no struggle at depth.
- Versatility – 10.0: Used in pools, quarries, warm and cool water — these gloves cover nearly everything short of winter.
- Durability & Build Quality – 9.0: Still holding up strong after repeat usage. No weak seams or material breakdown.
- Value – 8.5: A little more expensive than other 3mm gloves, but worth every penny for how often I reach for them.
- Brand Trust & Transparency – 9.0: Bare continues to deliver gloves that actually fit and perform.
Performance in the Water
- Thermal Comfort: I use these for most of my diving, including temperatures down to the high 50s. They have performed better than expected for a 3mm glove.
- Dexterity: Excellent. Easy to manipulate buckles, clips, and camera buttons.
- Fit: Tight but not restrictive. No excess material at the fingertips or palm.
- Durability: No signs of fraying or seam failure after regular use.