Helping divers make informed decisions about training, gear, skills, and safety at every stage of their journey.

Choosing a Dive Agency: SDI vs. SSI vs. PADI vs. GUE

Choosing a dive agency can seem overwhelming, but the truth is: your instructor matters far more than the agency itself. Most differences between agencies come down to training philosophy, course structure, and how they treat their instructors. This guide breaks down those differences so you can choose based on what actually matters.

What Is an Agency Actually Responsible For?

Before comparing agencies, it helps to understand what they actually do.

A scuba certification agency does three things:

That’s it. Everything else...the schedule, the gear you use, how your pool session feels...is handled by your instructor and the shop.

This is why choosing the right instructor matters more than choosing the right agency.


How to Choose


Feature PADI SSI SDI NAUI GUE
Training Availability Worldwide Very High High Moderate Low Very Low
Training Rigor Low to Moderate Moderate Moderate to High Variable Very High
Minimum Skill Standards Basic Basic to Moderate Moderate Variable High Mastery
Instructor Requirements Low to Moderate Low to Moderate Moderate Unknown Extensive Vetting
Training Philosophy Standardized Shop-Centered Instructor-Driven Instructor-Flexible Team-Based
Entry-Level Cost $$ $ $$ $ $$$$
Online Materials Basic Best-in-Class Text-Heavy Varies Minimal
Course Flexibility Moderate Low High Very High None
Tech Path Support Limited Limited Strong (via TDI) Yes Built-In
Instructor Variability Very High Moderate Moderate Unknown Very Low
* GUE released a new eLearning platform in early 2025 that I have not had a chance to use
"Training Rigor" reflects how comprehensive, real-world usable and complete the course content is. Not whether your instructor is good. A weak instructor can dilute even a great program, and a strong one can elevate a weaker one.

Matching an Agency to Your Goals


PADI (Professional Association of Diving Instructors)

PADI logo

Website: https://padi.com

Claims to Fame: The largest dive agency in the world. Present in nearly every major dive location.

Pros: Ubiquitous, well-known, easy to find training anywhere.

Cons: Wide instructor variability, heavy on marketing, meets only minimum training standards.

Personal Opinion: PADI has excellent instructors, and also very poor ones. Choosing the instructor matters far more than choosing PADI itself. There's nothing uniquely special about their curriculum compared to others.


SSI (Scuba Schools International)

SSI logo

Website: https://divessi.com

Claims to Fame: Best digital course material and mobile app.

Pros: Beautiful online learning tools, often slightly lower cost than PADI.

Cons: Tightly tied to dive shop systems, smaller presence in some regions, tied to Mares brand.

Personal Opinion: I’ve never met a bad SSI instructor. They’ve all been competent, but I wouldn’t describe the training as standout. Their focus seems to be more on supporting shops than divers.


SDI (Scuba Diving International)

SDI logo

Website: https://tdisdi.com

Claims to Fame: Strong tech diving roots (via TDI). First to integrate online training and Nitrox at the entry level.

Pros: Excellent for those planning to move into technical diving. Instructors often go above minimums.

Cons: Online learning is outdated and heavily text-based.

Personal Opinion: Many instructors I trust prefer SDI. Their policies allow for higher-quality instruction, even if their materials feel old-school.


NAUI (National Association of Underwater Instructors)

NAUI logo

Website: https://naui.org

Claims to Fame: Oldest certifying agency (founded 1959). Not-for-profit model.

Pros: Affordable, instructors have more freedom to tailor training.

Cons: Not widely recognized internationally. Few shops support it.

Personal Opinion: I have no direct experience with NAUI. They’re rarely mentioned online. That said, instructor flexibility can be a double-edged sword, depending entirely on who you get.


GUE (Global Underwater Explorers)

GUE logo

Website: https://gue.com

Claims to Fame: Widely considered the most rigorous and high-quality training in the industry.

Pros: Unmatched instruction quality, emphasis on team diving, deeply integrated technical diving.

Cons: Few instructors, strict equipment standards, expensive, not suited for casual divers.

Personal Opinion: If money, gear requirements, and travel weren’t barriers, I’d recommend GUE to everyone. It’s not a good fit for all divers, but for those who want excellence and challenge, it’s unbeatable.


Can You Switch Agencies?

Yes. Most recreational certifications are cross-recognized. You can start with Open Water from one agency and take your next course from another.

Exception: GUE does not accept non-GUE prerequisites. If you want to cross over you must pass their Fundamentals course, either Recreational or Technical.